Skip to content
Tags

Stack Ranking

July 20, 2012
stack monster

Would you want to work in a place that might rank you relatively, rather than absolutely?

Vanity Fair ran a piece awhile back about Microsoft and their tenure under Steve Ballmer. It’s no secret that Microsoft lost some of their dominance over the last decade and their fiscal performance has been less than outstanding. While they have built some great products in that time (XBOX, SQL Server, Windows 7), they’ve faltered and stalled on others, and have made their share of mistakes. Today I think many people see Microsoft as an important part of the tech world, but not necessarily a company that dominates any part of their industry.

One of the interesting things in the piece was a note that there is a stack ranking system of reviewing people. It’s a brutal system that pits people against each other, with the idea that there is a distribution of performance. Each group will have a high performer, and a low performer (or more than one) and a number of people in the middle. No matter what the actual circumstances, that’s how people are graded.

When I worked at Peoplesoft as a manager, we had a similar system. We graded people from 1-5, 5 being the highest. We had to have proof someone was worth a 1 or a 5, but we also couldn’t rank everyone as a 2, 3, or 4. We had to distribute our people. After I ranked my group and turned it in, our director had a “budget” of people ranked as 4s, and we had to argue with other managers to see which of our 4s would be downgraded to a 3.

I thought that was crazy. Some people thrive in that environment, but some don’t. Many people want to go to work and do work that would be rated a 3 or 4. Companies need those people because there’s always a percentage of work that suits people that do 4, 3, or even 2 level work. This Friday, ignoring the merits of such a system, I wanted to ask how you feel.

Would you like to work in a company that uses a stack ranking system?

I know I wouldn’t. I’m competitive, but that type of system just isn’t for me. I prefer to get along with and work with others, not compete with them on a daily basis.

Steve Jones


The Voice of the DBA Podcasts

We publish three versions of the podcast each day for you to enjoy.

From → Editorial

One Comment
  1. Rich H permalink

    Having worked in a place with this system in place(mgr and non) I totally agree that it has a pretty big downside. I cannot tell you the frustration I felt when I was told I could not give someone on my team, a total rockstar by all accounts, the rating they deserved because “those are all filled”. It leaves excellent employees at the mercy of management politics and many times partly a popularity contest. Needless to say both myself and that awesome DBA have moved on since.

Comments are closed.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,914 other followers

%d bloggers like this: